WASHINGTON — National Right to Life today expressed its support for H.R. 8806, the Supporting Newborn Parents Act, legislation that would provide immediate financial assistance to working families following the birth of a child. 

“For decades, National Right to Life has advocated for policies that affirm the dignity of every human life and create a culture that values life,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “The Supporting Newborn Parents Act offers practical assistance when families need it most.”

The bill would establish a newborn tax credit of up to $2,000 per child and allow eligible parents to receive the benefit shortly after the birth of their baby, rather than waiting until the annual tax filing season. The legislation recognizes that the weeks and months immediately following childbirth often bring significant new expenses and reduced household income as parents focus on caring for and bonding with their newborn child.

The legislation would provide a refundable tax credit tied to earned income, making it accessible to working families across a broad range of income levels. Parents would have the option of receiving an advance payment after the birth of their child, helping them cover costs such as diapers, formula, clothing, medical expenses, and other necessities associated with caring for a newborn. 

“The pro-life movement has always worked to build a culture that values both mother and child,” said Tobias. “H.R. 8806 represents a positive step toward ensuring that parents receive meaningful support during one of the most important transitions in their lives.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life today welcomed the Food and Drug Administration’s announcement that it is moving forward with a comprehensive review of the abortion drug mifepristone and its safety record. According to multiple news reports, the FDA is conducting a large-scale analysis of hundreds of thousands of cases and will examine data related to adverse events and complications associated with the drug.

The following is a statement from Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life:

For years, pro-life advocates, medical professionals, and members of Congress have raised serious concerns about the weakening of safety protections surrounding chemical abortion. We welcome a thorough and transparent review of the evidence.

Each abortion takes the life of a preborn child and places her mother at risk. Women aborting at home are also more likely to be traumatized when they realize that they aborted a living child and not just ‘tissue’ or ‘products of conception’ as the abortion industry claims.

The abortion industry has repeatedly insisted that the safety issues surrounding chemical abortion are settled science. Yet the FDA itself has determined that additional review is appropriate. When the health and safety of women are involved, no legitimate scientific question should be off limits.

Every woman deserves the highest standard of medical care. The FDA has both the authority and the responsibility to act. We encourage the agency to conduct this review with transparency, scientific integrity, and an unwavering commitment to protecting women.

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life, the nation’s oldest and largest pro-life organization, today proudly announced its endorsement of Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth for Governor of Minnesota.

“Lisa Demuth has a strong and consistent record of supporting both mothers and their unborn children,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “Her commitment to protecting innocent human life and supporting women and families is clear through both her leadership and her voting record. National Right to Life is proud to endorse her candidacy for governor.”

Demuth’s pro-life leadership stands in sharp contrast to the record of the presumptive DFL nominee, U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar. Throughout her career in the Senate, Klobuchar has repeatedly supported taxpayer funding of abortion, supported gruesome partial-birth abortions, opposed protections for babies born alive after an abortion, and backed legislation that would expand abortion with virtually no limits.

“Amy Klobuchar has embraced an extreme abortion agenda that is far outside the mainstream of Minnesota values,” Tobias said. “Minnesotans deserve a governor who respects the dignity and value of every human life, born and unborn.”

Tobias added that Demuth’s compassionate approach reflects the growing desire among Americans for leaders who support women, children, and families rather than promoting abortion.

“The people of Minnesota deserve a governor who recognizes that every human life has inherent worth,” Tobias said. “Lisa Demuth’s record demonstrates principled leadership, compassion, and respect for life, and we are honored to support her campaign for governor.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life proudly congratulates its longtime General Counsel, James Bopp Jr., on receiving the 2026 Leadership in Law Lifetime Achievement Award from The Indiana Lawyer.

The award, presented annually by The Indiana Lawyer, recognizes attorneys whose careers show exceptional achievement in the legal profession, service to their communities, and commitment to mentoring future generations of lawyers. The Lifetime Achievement Award honors attorneys with at least 25 years of distinguished service whose contributions extend beyond the practice of law. 

“Jim Bopp has dedicated his extraordinary legal career to defending constitutional freedoms and protecting the most vulnerable members of the human family,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “His legal insight, unwavering integrity, and tireless commitment to the pro-life cause have shaped the movement for decades and helped secure historic victories for unborn children and their mothers.”

As General Counsel for National Right to Life, Bopp played a central role in developing and implementing the long-term legal strategy that ultimately led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022.

“Jim Bopp’s legal leadership has left an indelible mark not only on the pro-life movement, but on American constitutional law itself,” Tobias said. “National Right to Life is deeply grateful for his decades of counsel, friendship, and principled advocacy.”

According to The Indiana Lawyer, the award recognizes attorneys “whose exemplary life’s work merits singular recognition.”

In accepting the honor, Bopp said, “I am thrilled and humbled by this honor from the highly respected Indiana Lawyer and from my legal peers. It is a testament to the fine associate lawyers who have joined me in our mission to advance the conservative cause and the wonderful support I have received from my wife, Tina, and my family. I have been incredibly blessed in my life, my law practice, and my community and political endeavors.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life expressed deep disappointment today following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that allows loosened regulations surrounding the abortion drug mifepristone to remain in place while broader legal and scientific questions continue to be debated.

“This decision is deeply troubling because it leaves women exposed to powerful abortion drugs,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “Women facing unexpected pregnancies deserve real medical care and support, not a one-size-fits-all mail-order abortion system that minimizes risks and leaves women isolated during medical emergencies.”

Under President Biden, the FDA expanded access to mifepristone through telehealth prescribing and mail delivery. Louisiana and other states have argued that the agency failed to adequately consider the impact on women’s health, emergency medical systems, and state authority to regulate medical practice. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked the Biden-era FDA rule that allowed abortion pills containing mifepristone to be distributed through the mail without an in-person medical visit.

“When abortion drugs can be ordered online with minimal medical oversight and shipped directly to homes, women become more vulnerable to coercion, manipulation, and exploitation,” Tobias said. “There have already been disturbing reports of abusive partners obtaining abortion drugs and administering them to women without their knowledge or consent. A regulatory system with weaker safeguards makes these crimes easier to commit and harder to prevent.”

Ongoing concerns include incomplete adverse event reporting, emergency room visits linked to chemical abortion complications, and the lack of meaningful long-term study regarding the effects of increasingly unrestricted distribution of abortion drugs.

Tobias added, “The evidence and concerns surrounding chemical abortion remain serious and unresolved.”

National Right to Life will continue advocating for policies that protect women and their unborn children.

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life praised the Trump Administration and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for launching Moms.gov, a new federal resource designed to support women, children, and families through pregnancy, childbirth, and early parenting.

“National Right to Life is grateful to President Trump, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and the Department of Health and Human Services for recognizing that mothers and families deserve real support,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life Committee. “Too often, women facing difficult or unexpected pregnancies are told abortion is their only option. Moms.gov sends a different message — that mothers, babies, and families matter, and that compassionate resources and assistance are available.”

The new website provides expecting and new mothers with access to practical information and life-affirming support services, including pregnancy centers, Federally Qualified Health Centers, nutritional guidance, breastfeeding resources, mental health support, adoption information, and other assistance programs.

The website’s inclusion of information about pregnancy centers highlights the important role these centers play in serving women with material assistance, parenting education, emotional support, and referrals for healthcare and social services.

“Women deserve access to comprehensive information and meaningful support throughout pregnancy and motherhood,” Tobias said. “By connecting families with resources that encourage health and hope, Moms.gov represents an important step toward building a culture that values both mother and child.”

The launch of Moms.gov coincides with Mother’s Day and reflects a broader commitment to promoting maternal and child well-being.

“Every child deserves the opportunity to be welcomed into the world, and every mother deserves support and encouragement,” Tobias added. “National Right to Life appreciates this effort to provide practical help for families at every stage of pregnancy and parenting.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life proudly announces its endorsement of two candidates seeking election to the South Dakota House of Representatives: Fred Deutsch for District 4 and Dale Bartscher for District 35.

Both candidates exemplify a strong commitment to protecting human life from conception to natural death. They have demonstrated a willingness to do the hard work necessary to build a culture that values life. They will work to enact life-saving legislation and protect both women and their unborn children from the violence of abortion. With national abortion forces targeting South Dakota through abortion pill shipments, now is the time to elect battle-tested warriors to the state house.

Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life, issued the following statement regarding Fred Deutsch, who is seeking election in House District 4:

 “Fred has long been a fighter in the fight for human life from fertilization to natural death. He also worked incredibly hard to help defeat the extreme Amendment G in South Dakota in 2024. He understands the human rights battle that we are in—that laws are upstream from culture—and that we must do everything we can to protect unborn babies and their mothers through strong laws and compassionate support.”

Regarding Dale Bartscher, who is seeking election in House District 35, Tobias added: 

“National Right to Life cannot be prouder of our longtime partnership with Dale Bartscher and his role with South Dakota Right to Life. Dale is a fighter for the protection of human life and will do whatever it takes to lawfully protect unborn children in the womb and provide support for their mothers. Dale is a compassionate pro-life warrior and will do great work in the South Dakota House of Representatives.”

Early voting has already begun ahead of the June 2 Republican Primary election. Voters are encouraged to contact their local county elections office for additional details.

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court today issued a temporary order allowing continued mail distribution of the abortion drugs mifepristone and misoprostol while litigation proceeds. The order is set to expire within days as the Court considers next steps in the case.

“Today’s action by the Court is not a final ruling on the merits of this case,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “It is a temporary procedural step that leaves unresolved the very real concerns about the safety of these drugs and the decision under the Biden administration’s FDA to recklessly remove longstanding safeguards.”

The challenged regulations stem from decisions by the Food and Drug Administration under the Biden administration to loosen safety protocols, including allowing abortion drugs to be prescribed via telehealth and delivered by mail. A federal appeals court had recently reinstated requirements for in-person medical oversight, citing concerns about the FDA’s actions.

Under the Biden administration, the FDA removed in-person medical supervision which places women at increased risk, particularly when complications arise without immediate access to a physician. Mifepristone, used in combination with another drug, can lead to serious adverse events including heavy bleeding, sepsis, and incomplete abortion requiring surgical intervention.

“When abortion drugs are mailed across state lines with little or no medical oversight, women are left to manage potentially dangerous complications on their own,” Tobias said. “This is not compassionate care — it is a dangerous experiment on women.”

Chemical abortion now accounts for a majority of abortions in the United States, increasing the urgency of ensuring proper safeguards are in place.

The Court’s temporary order merely preserves the status quo for a short period and does not validate the FDA’s decisions under the Biden administration or address the underlying legal and medical questions.

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision today temporarily blocks the Biden-era FDA rule that allowed abortion pills containing mifepristone to be distributed through the mail without an in-person medical visit. Today’s decision restores a critical layer of oversight for women’s health and state authority and reinstates the prior requirement that mifepristone be dispensed in person while litigation continues.

“This decision is an important step toward restoring common-sense medical safeguards that were recklessly discarded by the Biden administration in the rush to expand abortion pill access,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “Mail-order abortion drugs bypass basic protections such as physical exams, accurate pregnancy dating, screening for ectopic pregnancy, and the abortion-by-mail scheme complicates emergency care.”

Tobias continued, “Women deserve better than an abortion-by-mail system that prioritizes ideology over safety.”

The court’s ruling comes amid growing legal and medical scrutiny over the FDA’s loosening of mifepristone regulations under the Biden administration, particularly the removal of in-person dispensing requirements in 2023. Louisiana argued that the federal government failed to adequately justify these changes and ignored serious risks, including hemorrhage, sepsis, and complications that may require emergency intervention.

“For years, pro-life advocates have warned that mailing abortion drugs across state lines undermines both women’s health and duly enacted state protections for unborn children,” Tobias said. “Today’s decision recognizes that the FDA cannot simply sweep legitimate safety concerns aside in favor of politics.”

Medication abortions now account for a majority of U.S. abortions, making regulatory accountability more urgent than ever.

“The abortion industry has aggressively pushed convenience over caution,” Tobias added. “Women facing unexpected pregnancies deserve real medical care, real information, and real support—not dangerous shortcuts.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life today welcomed the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous decision allowing First Choice Women’s Resource Centers to challenge a New Jersey state investigation in federal court.

“The Supreme Court rightly recognized that government power cannot be used to intimidate or silence organizations simply because they offer life-affirming alternatives to abortion,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “Pregnancy resource centers exist to support women, provide practical assistance, and affirm the value of both mother and child. State officials should not weaponize investigations to chill protected speech or target donors because they disagree with a center’s mission.”

The case centered on a New Jersey subpoena seeking donor information and internal records from First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, a faith-based pregnancy center. The Court’s ruling ensures that organizations raising legitimate constitutional concerns can seek protection in federal court when faced with potentially abusive government overreach.

Marie Tasy, executive director of New Jersey Right to Life, the New Jersey affiliate of National Right to Life, stated. “The New Jersey Attorney General created a so-called ‘Reproductive Rights Strike Force’ and used it to target a pregnancy center that had not received a single public complaint. That is government overreach, plain and simple. Today the Supreme Court said: enough. Pregnancy centers have the right to fight back in federal court, and their donors have the right to give without fear of government retaliation.”

Tasy continued, “New Jersey Right to Life will stand with them every step of the way. Pregnancy centers across this state serve thousands of women every year, and we will never stop defending their right to do so — or the right of the people who make that work possible.”

Across the country, pregnancy resource centers provide millions of dollars in free medical services, parenting support, material aid, and emotional care to women facing unexpected pregnancies. These centers should be free to continue their work without political harassment.

“This unanimous decision sends an unmistakable message: Americans do not surrender their First Amendment freedoms when they advocate for unborn children,” Tobias said. “Women deserve compassionate care and real choices. Today’s ruling protects the freedom of those who offer hope, help, and life-affirming support.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life and a broad coalition of national and state pro-life organizations today urged Senate Republican leadership to immediately launch the 2026 budget reconciliation process to prevent federal taxpayer dollars from funding the abortion industry after July 4, 2026.

“Congress made history in 2025 by passing the One Big Beautiful Bill with a provision that stopped taxpayer dollars from subsidizing abortion providers for one year,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “Allowing that policy to expire would betray the American people who consistently oppose their money being used to prop up the abortion industry.”

In a letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Republican leadership, lawmakers are urged to include a provision in the upcoming reconciliation package to extend the prohibition on funding for the maximum ten years permitted under budget rules.

The letter highlights concerns about the activities of major abortion businesses, noting that many promote abortion as a core service and lobby for unlimited abortion. Planned Parenthood alone receives nearly $800 million annually in taxpayer funding, primarily through federal health programs.

“For decades, Congress has recognized that abortion should not be publicly funded,” Tobias said. “That bipartisan work is the foundation for the provision in the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill. We urge lawmakers to finish what they started.”

The coalition called on Senate Republican leaders to move without delay, warning that failure to act will allow hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to once again supplement abortion businesses nationwide.

“As our nation approaches its 250th anniversary, we affirm that life is an unalienable right. This truth is a cornerstone of our Republic and must guide our public policy,” Tobias added. “Congress must protect taxpayers and unborn children—or allow federal funding of Big Abortion to resume. We urge lawmakers to choose life.”

The coalition letter can be found here.

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — A federal court ruled against the enforcement of an Oregon law that forced pro-life organizations to provide insurance coverage for abortion. Oregon Right to Life, the Oregon affiliate of National Right to Life, challenged the law in court and the judge determined that the law violates the constitutional rights of Oregon Right to Life.

“This is a tremendous victory not only for Oregon Right to Life, but also for the fundamental freedoms protected by the First Amendment,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “No organization should be forced by the government to pay for or promote abortion. This ruling rightly recognizes that Americans do not surrender their constitutional rights when they operate a nonprofit organization.”

The ruling represents a significant legal win for Oregon Right to Life, affirming that the government cannot compel organizations to facilitate or subsidize practices that contradict their core beliefs.

In a press release, Oregon Right to Life’s lead counsel and general counsel for National Right to Life, James Bopp, Jr. stated, “The First Amendment provides the plain guarantee that a state simply may not play favorites when it comes to religious organizations. It may not favor secular entities over entities with religious views and it may not favor one religious view over another.”

The challenged law, part of Oregon’s 2017 Reproductive Health Equity Act, required insurance providers to cover abortion and contraception without cost-sharing. While the law included a narrow religious exemption, Oregon Right to Life was denied that protection—prompting the lawsuit.

After initially being dismissed, the case was revived by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, leading to this week’s decision in favor of the pro-life organization.

Oregon Right to Life called the mandate “absurd” and emphasized that forcing a pro-life organization to fund abortion coverage was a clear violation of its constitutional rights.

“It was always absurd for Oregon to attempt to force Oregon Right to Life, as a pro-life organization, to fund abortion – the very practice we are dedicated to opposing,” Oregon Right to Life Executive Director Lois Anderson said. 

While the full scope of the ruling is still being finalized, it currently prevents the law from being applied to Oregon Right to Life and may have broader implications for similar mandates across the country.

“We commend Oregon Right to Life for its leadership in defending both the right to life and the freedoms of speech and conscience,” stated Tobias. “This case represents an important step in ensuring that pro-life Americans are not forced to choose between their beliefs and government mandates.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, April 7, 2026, Idaho’s federal district court struck down a subpoena served on pro-life advocacy organization Right to Life of Idaho, Inc. (“RTLI”), in Matsumoto v. Labrador. The court found that the First Amendment shields political advocacy organizations like RTLI from being forced to release their communications to legislators when doing so could chill the organization’s speech.

The plaintiffs, pro-abortion entities seeking to overturn an Idaho law prohibiting the trafficking of minors for abortion, had targeted their ideological opponent, pro-life RTLI, with a subpoena issued in September 2025, attempting to dig through RTLI’s communications and records. The subpoena demanded that RTLI, which was not even a party to the case, provide years’ worth of its communications with legislators concerning Idaho House Bills 242 and 98.

RTLI argued that, as an organization whose chief purpose and strategy relies on its ability to communicate freely with legislators, a ruling that would require it to release such communications any time related litigation was filed would certainly inflict direct harm on its ability to engage in such speech and association. Legislators would be less inclined to communicate with RTLI if those communications could be demanded on a whim any time pro-abortion groups filed a lawsuit.

The court agreed, finding that RTLI’s First Amendment rights were at stake. The court also found that the plaintiffs had not established a need for the documents sufficient to overcome the First Amendment’s protections. Indeed, binding Ninth Circuit precedent plainly requires a party seeking such discovery to obtain it, if possible, from sources that do not implicate the First Amendment—yet the plaintiffs had not even attempted the simple step of lodging a request under Idaho’s robust public records law before dragging RTLI into court. Accordingly, the court declined to enforce the subpoena.

James Bopp, Jr., of The Bopp Law Firm, PC, and counsel for RTLI, said, “The First Amendment does not magically cease to exist in civil litigation discovery. The court correctly recognized that a party cannot overcome its protections of speech and association by simply filing a lawsuit—particularly when that party has not even tried to take simple, reasonable steps to obtain the discovery in a manner that does not implicate the First Amendment at all. The court correctly stopped the plaintiffs’ attempt to force RTLI, their ideological opponent, to hand over its private communications.”

The court’s order is available here.

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life today expressed strong support for the oversight letters issued by the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee examining the business practices of manufacturers and distributors of the chemical abortion drug mifepristone, as well as the failure to enforce federal law against illegal online sales.

“These letters raise serious and long-overdue questions about whether federal protocols are being followed—and whether women are being put at risk as a result,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “The American people deserve transparency, accountability, and above all, protection from dangerous and unlawful practices.”

The Senate letters highlight concerns that manufacturers of mifepristone may not be adequately ensuring compliance with the Food and Drug Administration’s Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), which is intended to mitigate the risk of serious complications associated with the drug. These safeguards include requirements that prescribers be properly certified, that patients be informed of risks, and that appropriate medical care be available in the event of complications.

However, evidence cited in the letters suggests that online distribution of chemical abortion drugs is undermining these protections. Some online providers appear to prescribe the drugs based on minimal screening, raising concerns about whether they can accurately assess gestational age, diagnose ectopic pregnancies, or ensure access to emergency care.

The letters also document the widespread availability of unapproved and misbranded chemical abortion drugs sold through online retailers in violation of federal law. These drugs may be manufactured overseas, lack proper labeling, and be distributed without any medical oversight—posing significant risks to women’s health.

“Federal law is clear: unapproved and misbranded drugs cannot be sold in the United States,” Tobias said. “Yet these illegal online operations continue to flourish, often encouraging women to conceal critical medical information if complications arise. That is a direct threat to patient safety.”

The letters also raise concerns about the erosion of safeguards in recent years, including the removal of in-person dispensing requirements and the elimination of reporting requirements for non-fatal adverse events. These changes have made it more difficult to fully assess the risks associated with chemical abortion and ensure that women receive appropriate care.

Additionally, the letters raise troubling questions about the lack of transparency among certain manufacturers, including limited public information about corporate leadership, manufacturing locations, and distribution practices.

“Women deserve real medical care, not drugs dispensed through anonymous websites with little to no oversight,” Tobias said. “We commend the Senate HELP Committee for taking these concerns seriously and look forward to meaningful action that prioritizes women’s health and safety.”

Founded in 1968, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of affiliates in each of the 50 states, is the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect innocent human life from abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia.